Husqvarna Automower 115H vs Worx Landroid M500: Which Should You Buy?

Last updated: 2026-09-18 · By NicheHive Editorial

This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, NicheHive earns from qualifying purchases. See our full disclosure.

The Husqvarna Automower 115H (0.4-acre coverage, boundary wire) and the Worx Landroid M500, sold in the US as the WR147 Landroid M (1/4-acre coverage, AIA navigation), are the two most-compared entry-level robot mowers. This comparison covers coverage, navigation, price, and who should buy each.

Husqvarna Automower 115H
9.2

Husqvarna Automower 115H

  • ✓0.4-acre (17,000 sq ft) coverage
  • ✓Boundary wire guidance
  • ✓4G connectivity with app control
  • ✓PIN-protected anti-theft alarm
  • ✓Quiet-operation motor design

Pros

  • 0.4-acre coverage is meaningfully larger than the Landroid M's quarter acre
  • 4G connectivity works without relying on home WiFi range reaching the yard
  • Husqvarna's dealer network gives it a stronger long-term parts and service reputation
  • Quiet operation makes overnight mowing schedules practical for more households

Cons

  • Typically priced somewhat higher than the Landroid M at full list
  • No dedicated narrow-passage navigation feature like the Landroid M's AIA
  • Boundary wire installation is comparable in effort, not faster than the Landroid M

Best for households with a straightforward lawn up to 0.4 acres who want Husqvarna's reliability track record and don't need narrow-passage navigation.

Worx Landroid M (WR147)
8.7

Worx Landroid M (WR147)

  • ✓1/4-acre (10,890 sq ft) coverage
  • ✓AIA narrow-passage navigation
  • ✓20V Power Share battery platform
  • ✓Floating blade disc for uneven terrain
  • ✓App-based no-go zone mapping

Pros

  • AIA navigation handles narrow side-yard passages more reliably than a randomized-path mower
  • Typically the lower-priced option of the two at full list
  • Power Share battery compatibility adds value for existing Worx tool owners
  • Floating blade disc reduces scalping risk on mildly uneven ground

Cons

  • Smaller coverage ceiling, a quarter acre versus the 115H's 0.4 acres
  • Some owners report a more involved initial setup with occasional resets
  • Smaller overall ratings pool and less established long-term reliability record

Best for smaller lawns split into multiple connected sections, where narrow-passage navigation matters more than raw coverage.

Two entry-level robot mowers, two different philosophies. The Automower 115H leans on Husqvarna's reliability and a larger coverage ceiling, while the Worx Landroid M leans on smarter navigation for complicated small yards.

The 115H covers up to 0.4 acres using boundary wire and 4G app connectivity, typically listing around $600 to $700 with frequent discounts.

The Landroid M (badged M500 in Europe, WR147 in the US) covers a quarter acre with AIA navigation built specifically for narrow passages, usually at a lower list price than the 115H.

Both require boundary wire installation, and neither includes GPS-based routing, that capability is reserved for the premium tier above roughly $2,000.

The decision mostly comes down to lawn size and shape: a straightforward lawn up to 0.4 acres favors the 115H, while a smaller, more oddly shaped lot favors the Landroid M.

The Short Answer

Buy the Husqvarna Automower 115H if your lawn is close to or under 0.4 acres, is relatively simple in shape, and you want Husqvarna's established reliability record.

Buy the Worx Landroid M if your lawn is under a quarter acre, split into multiple connected sections, or you're working with a tighter budget.

Spec Comparison

SpecAutomower 115HLandroid M (WR147)
Coverage0.4 acre (17,000 sq ft)1/4 acre (10,890 sq ft)
NavigationBoundary wireBoundary wire + AIA narrow-passage routing
Connectivity4G with app controlWiFi with app control
Cutting height2 to 3.6 inchesAdjustable, floating blade disc
Typical price$600 to $700Generally lower list price
Anti-theftPIN-protected alarmApp-based tracking

Where They Match

Boundary wire installation: Both require a comparable physical setup process, laying and pinning wire around the perimeter and no-go zones.

App-based scheduling: Both offer smartphone app control for mowing schedules and monitoring.

Basic safety sensors: Both include lift, tilt, and collision-stop protections as standard.

Where the Automower 115H Wins

Coverage: 0.4 acres versus a quarter acre is a real difference for anything approaching half an acre.

Reliability track record: Husqvarna's long Automower production history and dealer network give the 115H a stronger reputation for parts and service longevity.

Connectivity reach: 4G connectivity doesn't depend on home WiFi signal reaching the charging dock, useful for larger properties where the router is far from the yard.

Where the Landroid M Wins

Narrow-passage navigation: AIA is purpose-built for yards with tight connecting corridors between lawn sections, a genuine practical advantage over a randomized-path mower.

Price: Typically the lower-cost option at full list, a meaningful factor for budget-conscious buyers.

Power Share compatibility: For households that already own Worx Power Share tools, shared battery compatibility adds cross-tool value.

Who Should Buy Each

Husqvarna Automower 115H: lawns up to 0.4 acres, relatively simple shapes, buyers prioritizing established reliability.

Worx Landroid M: lawns under a quarter acre, multi-section layouts with narrow connectors, tighter budgets.

Husqvarna Automower 115H on Amazon

Worx Landroid M on Amazon

See Also

Frequently Asked Questions

NicheHive EditorialEditorial Team

Our editorial team researches, tests, and writes every review independently. We never accept payment for placement.