Which is better for wet leaves, the Greenworks or the Toro?

The Toro F700, clearly. Its 725 CFM is more than double the Greenworks' 340 CFM, and CFM is the spec that matters most for lifting heavy, matted wet leaves. The Greenworks is better reserved for dry or lightly damp debris.

Is the vacuum mode on the Greenworks worth giving up airflow for?

For yards that generate moderate, mostly dry leaf volume, yes, the ability to bag leaves directly saves a raking step. For yards with heavy or wet leaf volume, the airflow tradeoff isn't worth it, since the Greenworks' vacuum mode also struggles with wet debris.

Which costs less to own over time?

The Toro, generally. It has no battery to eventually replace, a real cost that cordless tools face every few years as batteries lose capacity. The Greenworks' upfront price is often similar or slightly higher once you factor in eventual battery replacement.

Which is easier for a quick 10-minute cleanup?

The Greenworks. Cordless tools win for short, spontaneous cleanup sessions since there's no cord to run out and connect. The Toro is better suited to planned sessions where you've already positioned an extension cord.

Can I use the Toro for gutter cleaning like the Greenworks?

Not recommended in the same way. The Greenworks' cordless design is safer for ladder-based gutter work since there's no cord to manage while climbing. The Toro works better with a ground-level extension kit on single-story homes than for direct ladder use.

Greenworks 40V vs Toro PowerJet F700: Cordless Convenience or Corded Power?

The Greenworks 40V blower/vacuum (340 CFM, cordless) and Toro PowerJet F700 (725 CFM, corded) sit at similar price points but take opposite approaches. This comparison covers airflow, convenience, and who should buy each.

One of these blowers doubles as a vacuum and never needs a cord. The other more than doubles the airflow and never needs a battery.

The Greenworks 40V blower/vacuum and Toro PowerJet F700 sit in a similar price range but solve the leaf-clearing problem in opposite ways, cordless convenience with moderate power, versus corded power with no runtime limit.

The Greenworks delivers 340 CFM from a complete cordless kit that includes a battery, charger, and a bonus vacuum mode. The Toro counters with 725 CFM, more than double the airflow, from a corded design with no battery to buy, charge, or eventually replace.

For dry leaves on a small to medium yard, the Greenworks' cordless convenience and vacuum function are hard to beat. For wet, heavy, or large-volume debris, the Toro's raw CFM advantage takes over.

The Short Answer

Buy the Greenworks if you want cordless freedom, plan to use the vacuum mode, and mostly deal with dry leaves on a small to medium yard.

Buy the Toro PowerJet F700 if your yard is within reach of an outdoor outlet, you regularly deal with wet or heavy leaves, and you want the highest airflow at the lowest price.

Spec Comparison

Spec	Greenworks 40V	Toro PowerJet F700
Airflow	340 CFM	725 CFM
Air speed	185 MPH	140 MPH
Power source	40V battery, 4.0Ah included	Corded, 12-amp
Vacuum mode	Yes, with bag	No
Weight	7.3 lbs	Lighter, no battery pack
Runtime	Limited by battery charge	Unlimited while plugged in
Typical price	Under $130	Under $100

Where They Match

Price range: Both typically fall under $130, making this a genuinely close budget comparison rather than a premium-versus-budget one.

Build quality: Both feel solidly constructed for their price point, with no notable durability complaints in either direction.

Suitability for small yards: Either handles a small dry-leaf yard adequately, the difference shows up more clearly as debris volume or moisture increases.

Where Greenworks Wins

Cordless freedom: No cord to manage means faster setup and no extension cord purchase, a real convenience for quick or spontaneous cleanup.

Vacuum mode: The bagging function is a genuine feature the Toro simply doesn't offer, useful for anyone who wants to skip a separate raking step.

Weight: At 7.3 lbs, it's comfortable for extended one-handed use, including light gutter work.

Where Toro Wins

Raw airflow: 725 CFM versus 340 CFM is not a marginal gap. For wet leaves, pine needles, or heavy volume, the Toro clears debris the Greenworks struggles with.

No battery to replace: Over several years of use, a cordless tool's battery eventually loses capacity and needs replacement. The Toro has no such recurring cost.

Price: Typically the less expensive of the two, since there's no battery or charger built into the cost.

Who Should Buy Each

Greenworks 40V: small to medium yards, mostly dry leaf conditions, buyers who want vacuum functionality and cordless convenience.

Toro PowerJet F700: yards near an outdoor outlet, frequent wet or heavy leaf conditions, buyers who prioritize raw airflow and lower long-term cost over cordless freedom.

Greenworks 40V on Amazon

Toro PowerJet F700 on Amazon

Greenworks 40V vs Toro PowerJet F700: Cordless Convenience or Corded Power?

Greenworks 40V 185 MPH 340 CFM Cordless Blower/Vacuum

Pros

Cons

Toro PowerJet F700 Corded Electric Leaf Blower